Water Treatment: Match Water Quality to Its Intended Use
Water acceptable for one duty may be unsuitable for another. Define the required quality before selecting treatment or interpreting results. Depending on the application, relevant parameters can include hardness, conductivity, silica, suspended solids, organic content, or microbiological quality.
Reverse osmosis separates a feed stream into permeate and concentrate. Its performance changes with temperature, pressure, feed composition, and recovery. Normalization helps distinguish operating-condition changes from deterioration.
Reference: DuPont — Reverse Osmosis.
Recovery and Rejection Are Different
Recovery (%) = permeate flow ÷ feed flow × 100.
For a feed of 20 m³/h and permeate of 15 m³/h, recovery is 75%. A simple steady-state balance gives 5 m³/h of concentrate, assuming no other flows or accumulation.
Salt rejection (%) = (1 − permeate salt concentration ÷ feed salt concentration) × 100.
For illustrative concentrations of 1,000 mg/L in the feed and 20 mg/L in the permeate, apparent system rejection is 98%.
These results answer different questions. Recovery describes water yield; rejection describes the relative reduction in the measured dissolved-salt concentration. Neither number alone proves suitability for drinking, pharmaceutical use, or boiler feed.
Investigate Trends, Not Just Today's Value
Record feed temperature, pressures, stage pressure drops, stream flows, feed and permeate quality, pretreatment condition, and maintenance events. Use the membrane supplier's normalization method and criteria for performance assessment.
Conductivity can help trend ionic content, but its relationship to total dissolved solids depends on composition and temperature. Do not mix unlike analytical bases in a rejection calculation.
Reference: DuPont — FilmTec RO/NF Technical Manual.
Next step: Verify the water-quality specification and compare normalized performance before proposing membrane cleaning or replacement.
Record observations only where it is safe. Inspection inside equipment, electrical testing, chemical work and changes to protective controls require qualified personnel, approved isolation and the installed equipment manual. Never bypass a trip or repeatedly restart unsafe equipment. Engineering disclaimer
Measurements To Record
- Raw-water and product-water quality
- Filter and membrane differential pressures
- Feed, permeate and reject flows where applicable
- Conductivity, hardness and disinfectant measurements as relevant
Maintenance Checklist
- Log flows, pressures and product quality.
- Calibrate meters and verify sampling methods.
- Trend membrane performance using appropriate normalisation.
- Service filters and regeneration equipment using supplier instructions.
Evidence-Based Diagnosis
Low RO permeate flow
- Possible Causes
- Temperature change; fouling; inadequate feed pressure; pretreatment issue.
- Evidence To Collect
- Compare normalised performance with the clean baseline and review feed quality and pressure.
- Qualified Follow-Up
- Have the membrane specialist identify the cause and select an approved cleaning or corrective procedure.
High product conductivity
- Possible Causes
- Feed-quality change; membrane integrity issue; leakage; measurement error.
- Evidence To Collect
- Verify instruments and compare feed/product conductivity and rejection trend under similar conditions.
- Qualified Follow-Up
- Investigate integrity and operating conditions; segregate off-spec water according to the site procedure.
Hardness breakthrough
- Possible Causes
- Exhausted resin; poor regeneration; bypass leakage; high loading.
- Evidence To Collect
- Confirm hardness testing and review regeneration and flow records.
- Qualified Follow-Up
- Inspect regeneration and valves against the system design; verify quality before returning to normal service.
Record The Confirmed Result
Keep the asset model, time, load, ambient conditions, alarm code and relevant readings together. Compare with the last healthy baseline. Record the confirmed cause, approved corrective action and readings after restoration; check that the improvement persists before closing the investigation.
